Sygn. akt C-379/16
Provisional text
ORDER OF THE COURT (Ninth Chamber)
January 2017 (*)
(Rectification order)
In Case C‑379/16 P-REC,
APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 7 July 2016,
European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, established in Ettelbrück (Luxembourg),
European Dynamics Belgium SA, established in Brussels (Belgium),
Evropaïki Dynamiki – Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE, established in Athens (Greece),
represented by C.-N. Dede and D. Papadopoulou, dikigoroi,
appellants,
the other party to the proceedings being:
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by N. Bambara, acting as Agent,
defendant at first instance,
THE COURT (Ninth Chamber),
composed of E. Juhász (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, K. Jürimäe and C. Lycourgos, Judges,
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi,
Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,
after hearing the Advocate General,
makes the following
Order
On 24 November 2016, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Ninth Chamber) made the order in European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v EUIPO (C‑379/16 P, not published, EU:C:2016:905).
That order contains a clerical mistake which it is appropriate for the Court to rectify of its own motion under Article 103(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court.
On those grounds, the Court (Ninth Chamber) hereby orders:
1.The date mentioned after the operative part, on the last page of the order of 24 November 2016, European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v EUIPO (C‑379/16 P, not published, EU:C:2016:905), shall be rectified as follows:
‘Luxembourg, 24 November 2016.’
2.The original of the present order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified order. A note of that order shall be made in the margin of the original of the rectified order.
Luxembourg, 12 January 2017.
A. Calot Escobar
E. Juhász
Registrar
President of the Ninth Chamber
* Language of the case: English.
